Cases 11 - 20 of 1,008
Peterson v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Seth Peterson
Defendant:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch v. Peterson et al
as 4:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch
Defendant:
Jacob Peterson, Officer S. Wolf, Officer Hawken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aho et al v. Cass County et al
as 0:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Aho and Chad Cane
Defendant:
Cass County, Sandy Bennett, Jerri Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Mattie Peterson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Pickle v. Minnesota Association of Townships et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Pickle
Defendant:
Minnesota Association of Townships, Jeffrey S. Krueger, Steven M. Fenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Unknown
as 6:2024cv02001
Plaintiff:
Matthew Peterson
Defendant:
Unknown, Naph Care and Nurse Stevie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Kessons et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Jackson, Jr and Andrew Paul Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly Kessons, Chris Trip, Rebecca Bowker and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schuh v. Burgum et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tim Peterson v. Learfield Communications, LLC, et al
as 23-3773
Plaintiff:
Tim Peterson, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
Learfield Communications, LLC and Sidearm Sports, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
