Cases 11 - 20 of 158
Brooke Henderson, et al v. Springfield R-12 School District, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant / Appellee:
Springfield R-12 School District, Board of Education, of the Springfield R-12 School District, Grenita Lathan and others
Defendant:
Martha Doenning
Appellant:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and others
West Virginia, State of et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
Intervenor:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of and others
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach
Petitioner:
Members of Congress
Amicus Curiae:
Robert M. Miller, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WTAS, LLC et al v. West Tennessee Air Service, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv02015
Plaintiff:
WTAS, LLC, Kyle E. Rich and Melody L. Rich
Defendant:
West Tennessee Air Service, LLC, Monte Warne, Marianna Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Graham v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
Chester C. Graham
Defendant:
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC doing business as Xfinity, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Comcast of Minnesota/Wisconsin, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Parsons v. Hendrix
as 2:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Parsons
Defendant:
USA, Tennessee, State of and DeWayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hudson v. Marbley et al
as 4:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Xavier Cortez Hudson
Defendant:
Tina Marbley, CoreCivic West Tennessee Detention and Marrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. v. Husman et al
as 4:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew Husman, Zee Company, The Vincit Company, LLC doing business as The Vincit Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Missouri, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, Shalanda Young, in her official capacity as the Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget, Cecilia Rouse, in her official capacity as Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers and others
Kristi Noem, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 21-2542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Governor Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Dakota and South Dakota
Defendant / Appellee:
Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, Shannon A. Estenoz, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, Shawn Benge, in his official capacity as acting Director and Deputy Director of Operations of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Appellant:
State of Kansas, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
