Cases 41 - 50 of 63
McCoy et al v. Stanger et al
as 0:2011cv00272
Plaintiff:
Billy E McCoy
Defendant:
Bill Stanger , Kevin Lehman , Dustin Schwarze and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc et al
as 4:2010cv02012
Plaintiff:
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc
Defendant:
National Bank of Arkansas in North Little Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ladd
as 4:2010cv02219
Plaintiff:
Abu Bakr Ladd
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, State of Missouri, St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2010cv03164
Defendant:
Brenda L. Glinn and M. Jack Glinn
Plaintiff:
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
v. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.
as 4:2010cv03163
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv02532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Wubben et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 0:2010cv01962
Plaintiff:
Kester Wubben and Ralph Killing
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC , Lehman Brothers and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medicine Shoppe International, Inc. v. Lehman
as 4:2010cv00266
Plaintiff:
Medicine Shoppe International, Inc.
Defendant:
Lawrence Lehman
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Asberry v. Ownby et al
as 6:2010cv03036
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Asberry
Defendant:
Stanley Ownby, Pauline Ownby, Ownby Family, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv05097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
