Cases 61 - 70 of 89
Sinclair v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv06091
Plaintiff:
Kenneth N. Sinclair
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Sinclair v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 0:2012cv01754
Plaintiff:
Lynnette M. Sinclair
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sinclair v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
Kim D Sinclair
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jovanna Snider-Carpenter, et al v. City of Dixon, et al
as 12-1811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jovanna N. Snider-Carpenter, Bethany Thompson and J. T., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Dixon, Missouri, Cliffty Yoakum, Sabrina Sinclair and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00491
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Olson v. Schroeder et al
as 4:2011cv04088
Plaintiff:
Adam A. Olson
Defendant:
Chip Schroeder, Winner City Jail Administrators, Paul Schueth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATS Logistics Services, Inc. et al v. Sinclair
as 0:2010cv03867
Plaintiff:
ATS Logistics Services, Inc. and ATS Logistics Services, Inc. As Assignee of GE Wind Energy Inc.
Defendant:
William Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Campbell v. Stout et al
as 4:2010cv01090
Plaintiff:
Shalonda Campbell
Defendant:
Carl Stout, Mark Culbertson, Richard Spades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair & Rush, Inc. v. Protective Industries, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00953
Plaintiff:
Sinclair & Rush, Inc.
Defendant:
Protective Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sinclair v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00680
Plaintiff:
Eltracie Sinclair
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
