Cases 71 - 80 of 401
Scott-Knight v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
Natasha L. Scott-Knight
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Knight v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight and Phyllis M. Knight D.M.
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Judge Sheryl L. Lohaus, Darryl R. Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCormack v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Michael McCormack
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reid, Jeremy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Hawk Eye Flowback, LLC
as 3:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Bryson Knight
Defendant:
Hawk Eye Flowback, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Frazier et al v. Meyers et al
as 8:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Alphonso V. Frazier, II and Phyllis M. Knight
Respondent:
Michael Meyers and Nebraska Unicameral Legislature
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight et al v. Boyd
as 8:2022cv00041
Petitioner:
Cotrell T. Knight and Phyllis Marie Knight
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv01206
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Rory Griffin, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cullen v. Allstate Insurance Co. et al
as 5:2021cv05220
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Cullen
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Co., Kathi Jo Brinkley and Katie E. Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00865
Plaintiff:
Antonia Knight
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall D Reed, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
