Cases 71 - 80 of 6,387
Christopher Potter v. St. Charles County, et al
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Potter
Defendant:
St. Charles County, St. Charles County Prosecuting Attorney Office, St. Charles County Counselor's Office and others
Scott v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ruby Scott
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Husbands v. Rowland et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Husbands
Defendant:
Shelly Rowland, Sabrina Williams, Scott Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Almer v. Hanson et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Almer
Defendant:
Justin Hanson, Ronald Kind, Laif Rognlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aho et al v. Cass County et al
as 0:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Aho and Chad Cane
Defendant:
Cass County, Sandy Bennett, Jerri Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Radford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Scott Taylor, M Kelly, B Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thrift v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sean Alan Thrift
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, Tyrone Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Southern v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 4:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Southern
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Matthew Locke v. County of Hubbard, et al
as 24-1285
Plaintiff:
Matthew Locke
Defendant:
County of Hubbard, Cory Aukes, in his official and individual capacity and Scott Parks, in his official and individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
