Cases 1 - 10 of 516
Cody Obama v. Perkins et al
as 4:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Steven Ishmael Xander Cody Obama
Defendant:
Brian Perkins, Joseph Bivens and Brandon Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
James Gibson, Dexter Payne, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Carrols Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corporation, Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mumin v. Case Manager Carroll et al
as 8:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Defendant:
Case Manager Carroll, Shaun Settles, Case Worker Moeshoeshoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Christopher Carroll, et al
as 24-1773
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher L. Carroll, also known as Chris and Whiskey Dix Big Truck Repair, LLC
Carroll v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Leon Carroll
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Bobby Robertson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-1745
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, James Gibson, Warden, James Shipman, Deputy Warden, Varner Supermax and others
Kimery v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
