Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reise et al v. City of Calverton Park, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01335
Plaintiff:
Christina Reise, Alan Miller, Sharon D Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Calverton Park, Sean Gibbons and City of Calverton Park, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stockton v. Shelton
as 4:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Shelton, Joe Page, III, L Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ressler et al v. Jones
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
John Ressler and Paulette Ressler
Defendant:
Christopher D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Stange
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Jones
Defendant:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Young v. Maples Insurance Agency LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Young
Defendant:
Maples Insurance Agency LLC, Garry D Jones Insurance Inc and Murray David Maples, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. et al v. Knapp et al
as 0:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones Trust Company and Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
Defendant:
Cabrini Knapp and Minnesota Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
