Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Leuer v. Wentz et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Chad Leuer
Defendant:
Gregory Wentz, Roehl Leasing, LLC, Roehl Transport, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bruton v. City of Grand Forks et al
as 3:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Ray Bruton
Defendant:
City of Grand Forks, Luke Wentz, Caleb Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01972
Plaintiff:
Wilson Ospina, David Haughton, Jaood Wallace and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Olafson v. Schulz et al
as 3:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Olafson
Defendant:
Ann Schulz, Wanda Bear, Cindy Splee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00947
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wentz v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 0:2013cv01092
Plaintiff:
Jyll Wentz
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Love et al v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 4:2011cv00485
Plaintiff:
Donald Love , Robert Plunk , Katie M Pullins and others
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wentz v. Warden, North Dakota State Penitentiary
as 1:2010cv00077
Petitioner:
Robert Duane Wentz
Respondent:
Warden, North Dakota State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wentz v. Redmann
as 3:2009cv00088
Petitioner:
Robert D Wentz
Defendant:
Don Redmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hillard v. Fairbury, City of, et al
as 4:2008cv03031
Defendant:
Fairbury, City of, Fairbury Police Department, Rick Carmichael and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Hillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
