Cases 11 - 20 of 827,656
TECHNATOMY CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
TECHNATOMY CORPORATION, T4NG2 JV LLC, VETERAN FIRST TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
GOVCIO, LLC, DIGIPATHY LLC, MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
DEBS, et al., v. USA
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
FADI C DEBS, RODNEY ABRAMS, II, KENNETH A. HAMLER and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
GARNER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
THERESA GARNER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Kouyate et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
Moussa Kouyate, David Freifeld, Jarell Brown and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08102
Plaintiff:
Rosita George
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Mosley v. Dancy et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mosley
Defendant:
Austin Dancy, Wellpath LLC, Laconya Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
J. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
