Cases 101 - 110 of 196
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06687
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brud Rossmann v. Susan Wojcicki, et al
as 19-55731
Defendant / Appellee:
LENNERT LEADER, ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, US District Court Judge, US District Court, MIRIAM SEWELL, The District of Columbia, Rehabilitation Services Agency, Department of Disability Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUD ROSSMANN
State of California et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2019cv03807
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2018cv01115
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, United States Department of State, Sarah Heidema and others
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety, Electronic Frontier Foundation and The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Interested Party:
Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Michelle Flanagan, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 18-55717
Amicus Curiae:
GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., DOMINIC NARDONE, SAMUEL GOLDEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and JAMES MCDONNELL, Sheriff of Los Angeles County
Caristo v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2019cv04452
Plaintiff:
Richard Caristo
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation a District of Columbia corporation authorized to do business in Arizona doing business as Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Brud Rossmann v. Susan Wojcicki, et al
as 19-55359
Defendant / Appellee:
LENNERT LEADER, ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, US District Court Judge, US District Court, MIRIAM SEWELL, The District of Columbia, Rehabilitation Services Agency, Department of Disability Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUD ROSSMANN
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor:
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
