Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Mace AbdullahIn re: Mace Abdullah
as 21-80067
Respondent: In re: MACE ABDULLAH, Esquire, Admitted to Ninth Circuit Bar, April 7, 1991
Chappell v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv05082
Plaintiff: Steven Mace Chappell
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Malaby v. Shinn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00403
Respondent: David Shinn and Allistair Adelle
Petitioner: Mace Allen Malaby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malaby v. Garcia
as 2:2020cv02325
Plaintiff: Yolanda S Malaby and Mace Allen Malaby
Defendant: Stephen S Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Gill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00906
Defendant: Richard Fredricks, Gregory Magnus, Incorporated City of Eugene and others
Plaintiff: Alexi Elias Ghenatos, Christina Chapman, Amanda Dupray-Raley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mace v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04184
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: Jerry Mace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mace v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01993
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: Larry Mace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00998
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mace v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02731
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: Larry Mace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Santiago et al
as 2:2017mj02717
Defendant: Shrae Amber Mace (2), Krystal Merlin (3) and Claudia Santiago (1)
Plaintiff: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?