Cases 31 - 40 of 6,686
Audley G. Evans v. The United States of America
as 5:2024cv00959
Petitioner:
Audley G. Evans, II
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Pike et al v. Littlejohn Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Cheri Pike and Carole Machado
Defendant:
Littlejohn Financial Services, Inc. and Fred David Littlejohn II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McCleland v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
James F McCleland, II
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Rosa Inchausti, Andrew Ching and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. United States Veterans Administration
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Scott v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Kamala Harris and Joseph R Biden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Umberger et al v. City of Folsom et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
George P. Umberger, II, Lisabeth A. King and Savannah R. Bailey
Defendant:
City of Folsom, Joseph Howard, Brian Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Ronald Haynes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
