Cases 41 - 50 of 187
Hurley v. Go Daddy Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv05635
Defendant:
Go Daddy Incorporated, Microsoft Corporation, GoDaddy Operating Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick J Hurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black-Hurley v. Life Care Centers of America Incorporated et al
as 4:2019cv00514
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Life Care Centers of America Incorporated and Life Care Centers of America Incorporated doing business as Life Care Center of Tucson
Plaintiff:
Sharon Black-Hurley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Black-Hurley v. Life Care Centers of America Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv05428
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Life Care Centers of America Incorporated and Life Care Centers of America Incorporated doing business as Life Care Center of Tucson
Plaintiff:
Sharon Black-Hurley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Shaun Hurley
as 19-10352
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAUN HURLEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(PC) Brownlee v. Baughman et al
as 2:2019cv01987
Defendant:
D. Hurley, David Baughman, M. Voong and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Justin Brownlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurley v. EQD Casio
as 3:2019cv05885
Defendant:
EQD Casio and EQC
Plaintiff:
Terry Hurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurley v. Saul
as 4:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Hurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Henderson et al v. Hurley Development LLC
as 3:2019cv05801
Plaintiff:
Boyd Henderson and Celeste Henderson
Defendant:
Hurley Development, LLC and Hurley Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michele Ann Hurley v. Andrew M. Saul
as 2:2019cv05954
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Michele Ann Hurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(PC)Diaz v. Hurley et al
as 2:2019cv01241
Defendant:
Hall, Farmar, Hurley and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Enrique Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
