Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Baker v. Prescott, City of et al
as 3:2018cv08324
Defendant:
Prescott, City of, Harvey Skoog, Jodi Rooney and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Guyger et al
as 3:2018cv02902
Defendant:
Amber Guyger, Walmart and Dallas Police Department
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dale Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Williams v. WalMart's, President et al
as 1:2018cv00518
Defendant:
Wal-Mart's, Vice President, WalMart's, President, John/Jane Does(s) and others
Plaintiff:
James W.D. Williams, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Mobil Gas Station et al
as 3:2018cv01675
Defendant:
City of National City, Escondido Transit, Walmart in SD and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brooks v. Walmart Dept. Store
as 3:2018cv00496
Defendant:
Walmart Dept. Store
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Cush Acura et al
as 3:2018cv01235
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Defendant:
Cush Acura, Toyota of Escondido, Cush Honda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Walmart Store Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv14095
Plaintiff:
William Calvin Hunt
Defendant:
Walmart Store Inc., Martez Bostic and Kenneth Toney
Lingelbach v. Thompson et al
as 3:2017cv00512
Plaintiff:
Randy S. Lingelbach, Jr.
Defendant:
Jerrod Thompson, Duane Lopez and Fernandina Beach Walmart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al. v. Dayton et al.
as 0:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson, Similarly Situated Prisoner's at All Minnesota Correctional Facilities and Other similarly Situated Prisoner's At Rush City Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Tina Smith, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Benjamin et al
as 3:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
Regan T. James
Defendant:
Stephen Benjamin, Daniel Hood, Jeffery Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.