Cases 11 - 20 of 3,606
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Saleh v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Saleh
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Seyedi Partners et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv04382
Plaintiff:
FARANAK SOFALIAN
Petitioner:
SEYEDI PARTNERS
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Carrillo v. X Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
X Incorporated, Bitcoin, Coinbase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rose v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Interested Party:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Lim v. Eckert et al
as 4:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Susan Lynn Eckert, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lim v. Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California et al
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cutting Edge Vision, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Cutting Edge Vision, LLC
Defendant:
T Mobile US, Inc. and T Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
