Cases 81 - 90 of 829,039
Alexander v. PNC Bank
as 8:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Dominic Pierre Alexander, 1st.
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Ragouzis v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Edgar T. Ragouzis and Edgar Thomas Ragouzis
Defendant:
Jr. Richardo O. Hamilton, John and Jane Doe(s) and ABC Legal Entities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey, Tsunami Khan and Chief Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Mr. Stoval, Tony Shult and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Deere v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Amber Nicole Deere
Defendant:
Mallory West, James Carter, David West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mussi et al v. Fontes
as 2:2024cv01310
Plaintiff:
Scot Mussi, Gina Swoboda and Steven Gaynor
Defendant:
Adrian Fontes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cruz-Colin #193913 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Eleazar Cruz-Colin and Adrian Gonzalez Cruz
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bluhm v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08108
Petitioner:
Michael Bluhm
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv01320
Plaintiff:
Joeydenise Rivera
Defendant:
Russell Skinner, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
