Cases 21 - 30 of 81
James Miller v. Scott Harris, et al
as 19-56319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, in his individual and official capacity and DOES
Albright v. US
as 19-2078
Plaintiff:
COCHRAN 2 LLC, BENJAMIN H. HATHAWAY, GARY E. ALBRIGHT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MILLER, ARLENE FRANCES WOLEVER TRUST, JAMES A. KLIEWER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Parshall et al v. Fidelity Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01098
Defendant:
Clyde W. Shepherd, III, H. Palmer Proctor, Jr., Rodney D. Bullard and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2013mc00057
Respondent:
JAMES ANDREW LOWES, JOSEPH ALLAN KELLEY, JANA ASHLEY HAGEMAN and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Miller
as 3:2018cv05761
Defendant:
James Douglas Miller
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Miller v. Miller (TWP2)
as 1:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
James Christopher Miller
Defendant:
Elizabeth Cofer Miller
Cause Of Action: International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Judd v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. et al
as 4:2018cv00799
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Judd
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., Marsha C. Williams, L. Richard Flury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JSC Transmashholding v. Miller
as 1:2018mc00007
Plaintiff:
JSC Transmashholding
Defendant:
James F. Miller
Patel v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. et al
as 4:2018cv00550
Plaintiff:
Parimal Patel
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., L. Richard Flury, Forbes I.J. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
