Cases 31 - 40 of 1,942
Shackleford v. Dejoy
as 24-204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVE D. SHACKLEFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DEJOY, Mr., Postmaster General, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, USPS, GARY BARKSDALE, Mr., Inspector General and others
NLRB v. USPS
as 24-1054
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Hernandez-Hernandez et al v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Jose H. Hernandez-Hernandez and Safe Logistic, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Highland Village Partners LLC v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2024cv08010
Plaintiff:
Highland Village Partners LLC
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Louis DeJoy and Jessica H Moore
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Kulick v. De Joy, et al.
as 24-171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. J. KULICK
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DE JOY, DOES, 1-100 and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service
as 23-13730
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Purisima v. Babcock et al
as 1:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
Anton C. Purisima, Four Son's of Anton C. Purisima, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Morgan Babcock, City of New York, New York State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Julian v. DeJoy
as 23-11101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jennifer T. Julian
Defendant / Appellee:
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General United States Postal Service (Southern Area) Agency
Drew v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Courtney S Drew
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Thomas J Blum, Bernadette Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
