Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Zuffa, LLC v. Ellersick et al
as 2:2010cv00987
Plaintiff:
Zuffa, LLC
Defendant:
Richard Thomas Ellersick and R. Ellersick Brewing Co.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Thomas et al v. I.C. Systems, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00079
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas and Wendy Thomas
Defendant:
I.C. Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Trussnet USA, Inc. v. Lendrum, et al
as 2:2008cv01181
Defendant:
Peter A Lendrum, Jamie R Lendrum, Richard Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Trussnet USA, Inc. and Trussnet USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richard Steltzer v. State of Iowa
as 08-2355
Petitioner:
Richard Thomas Steltzer
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Latha Anderson v. FERC
as 08-1131
Petitioner:
Latha Anderson, Joseph W. Bennett, Jr., Lincoln H. Bounds and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
Shell NA LNG LLC, Southern LNG, Inc. and Southern Natural Gas Company
US v. Richard Stitt
as 07-11
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD THOMAS STITT, a/k/a Patrick V. Hardy, a/k/a Tom Tom
University Sports Publications Co Inc et al v. Richard Thomas Rizzo et al
as 2:2007cv01049
Plaintiff:
University Sports Publications Co Inc and Professional Sports Publications Inc
Defendant:
Richard Thomas Rizzo and Skies America Publishing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MANNING V US
as 06-1553
Defendant-Appellee:
AMR of Massachusetts, Inc., AT&T Broadband, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Richard Thomas Manning
Thomas v. Sambol, et al
as 3:1999cv00468
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas
Defendant:
Mark K Bentley , Monica Tenney , Steve Gresock and others
Counter_claimant:
Richard Thomas
Counter_defendant:
Peggy Marshall, Damon Racicot, James nmi Brookshire and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
