Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 269
State of Kansas, et al v. Garland, et al
as 24-3101
Plaintiff: STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as the United States Attorney General and STEVEN M. DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF OHIO
Butler et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00975
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives, Steven Dettelbach and others
Plaintiff: Don Butler, National Rifle Association of America and David Glidewell
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Bureau of Alcohol
as 24-10612
Plaintiff: State of Mississippi, State of Texas, Tennessee Firearms Association and others
Defendant: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Merrick Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Harris v. Carlson
as 4:2024cv00737
Respondent: Krissy Y. Carlson, in her official capacity as Director of Industry Operations, Dallas Field Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Petitioner: Thomas Roy Harris, Jr., d/b/a Sporting Arms Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208 (B) Agency Action Review
National Association v. Garland
as 24-10707
Defendant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and others
Plaintiff: James Wheeler, National Association for Gun Rights, Incorporated, Travis Speegle and others
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. et al v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES
as 1:2024cv02291
Defendant: BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES
Plaintiff: GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. and GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv01086
Plaintiff: Virginia, State of, South Carolina, State of, Idaho, State of and others
Defendant: United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae: Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, March for Our Lives, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Petitioner: Ohio, State of
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Pawn, U.S.A., Inc v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
as 7:2024cv00484
Petitioner: Pawn, U.S.A., Inc
Respondent: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff: Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant: United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae: Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, March for Our Lives, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff: State of Texas, State of Louisiana, State of Mississippi and others
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol Tabacco Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Intervenor: Levi Rudder
Amicus Curiae: Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund, March for Our Lives and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?