Cases 121 - 130 of 28,834
Scaife v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1240
Petitioner:
VERYL B. SCAIFE
Respondent:
TERRY JACQUES, Warden, ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, CDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Grice v. Dawson et al
as 8:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Chad L. Grice
Defendant:
Warden Jacob Dawson, Assistant Warden B. Walden, Assistant Warden P. Catalano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hubbard
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Nurse B. Carroll and R.N.P. Audia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Washington County et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Philemon Alexander
Defendant:
Washington County, B. Jenkins, Ruipert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Self, Carl v. Cromwell, Dan et al
as 3:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Carl F. Self
Defendant:
Dan Cromwell, Timothy Thomas, Anna Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snipes v. Olson et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Traymonte B. Snipes
Defendant:
Olson, C. Duenos, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv06509
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE B. CONNER
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Masson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11004
Petitioner:
DANIEL B. MASSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
