Cases 41 - 50 of 937
Griffith v. Warden
as 5:2023ct03230
Plaintiff:
Timothy Griffith
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tunsil v. Laurel et al
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Defendant:
Harry Laurel, WellPath, Inc, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van den Heuvel v. El Dorado County Judicials et al
as 2:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
John Mark Van den Heuvel
Defendant:
El Dorado County Judicials, Brandon Sharp, Kyle Aaron Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grooms v. Cox et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jordan Grooms, Sr.
Defendant:
Casey Cox, Tim Clafflin, John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Timothy Griffith
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMALL v. FISHER et al
as 1:2023cv03685
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. SMALL
Defendant:
KEISHA FISHER, WILLIE BONDS, DR. S. COLLIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hodge, et al
as 23-1209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR JAMES MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. HODGE, CARLY REY-HAYES, MARSHALL GRIFFITH and others
Eaves (PS) v. Cox et al
as 1:2023cv01625
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Larry Cox, Roscoe Mueller, Jessica Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollowell v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
JoVon Montell Hollowell
Defendant:
Norman L. Barnett, Stephanie E. Gabay-Smith, Byron L. Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. El Paso County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Defendant:
El Paso County Sheriff Office, Chad Miller, U.S. District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
