Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 6,295
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff: Jerone Alexander
Defendant: Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adames v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00319
Petitioner: Alexander Adames
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton v. Western Illinois CC
as 3:2024cv03076
Plaintiff: Alexander Hampton
Defendant: Western Illinois CC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Foster, Jr. v. Warren Alexander
as 24-6313
Plaintiff: MARK BRIAN FOSTER, JR.
Defendant: WARREN ALEXANDER, BRYANT POOLE and CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, Eastern Correctional
ALEXANDER v. SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner: KAREEM-LATEEF ALEXANDER
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS and PA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21882
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01169
Plaintiff: Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant: William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, NDZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Walmart Stores et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Alexander Eric Pierce
Defendant: Walmart Stores and E Polack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Alexander Eric Pierce
Defendant: Lubbock Police Department, Jasmine Garcia, Jonathon J. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hancock v. Fuller
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff: Anthony Eugene Hancock
Defendant: Hugh Alexander Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?