Cases 51 - 60 of 5,756
WALLACE v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Defendant:
IAN GUSTAFSON, STEPHEN HAGGERTY, COLBY HOLLIS and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Bell v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Control, Brown and Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary et al
as 5:2024cv03085
Defendant:
Leavenworth U.S. Penitentiary, (fnu) McMillen, (fnu) Elam and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary et al
as 3:2024cv50200
Defendant:
Chaplain Sutton, Sears, Leavenworh Penitentiary and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neal v. Killeen Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Danny O'Neal
Defendant:
Killeen Police Department and Bell County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Hall et al
as 6:2024cv00290
Defendant:
Bell County Law Enforcement Center, Officer S. Blue and Billy Ray Hall
Plaintiff:
Reggie Montel Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv06504
Respondent:
CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS W. SUMMERS, JUDGE FRANCIS A. MCGROGAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Petitioner:
KENT BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03126
Defendant:
O. Rodriguez, Captain Wright, Nicholas Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Woodard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crump v. Clemens et al
as 5:2024cv03076
Defendant:
Becky (lnu), Johnson County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners, (fnu) (lnu) (2) and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
