Cases 1 - 10 of 6,260
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adames v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00319
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
ALEXANDER v. SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
KAREEM-LATEEF ALEXANDER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS and PA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hancock v. Fuller
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Hancock
Defendant:
Hugh Alexander Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dansby v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04046
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Dansby
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Otto Warner and Correctional Officer Paige Betts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Toddell Alexander v. USA
as 24-3408
Petitioner:
TODDELL ALEXANDER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BROWN v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2024cv02067
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER BROWN
Respondent:
MS. BOBBI JO SALAMON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNYSLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
