Cases 101 - 110 of 828,996
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
J NEEL, E MANNERS, S GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diarra v. Biden
as 1:2024cv02429
Petitioner:
Moussa U'nra Diarra
Respondent:
U. S. President Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cook v. Yetman et al
as 4:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Cook
Defendant:
Officer M. Yetman, A. Shumate and St. Francois County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Denise et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tyler Hill
Defendant:
Denise, Ashley, Triston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray #14672-040 v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Joseph S. Gray #14672-040
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Winn Trust Mortgage, Barrington Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Deere v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Amber Nicole Deere
Defendant:
Mallory West, James Carter, David West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Catlett v. West et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Angela Catlett
Defendant:
Mallory West, James Carter, David West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Seamster et al
as 4:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Mark Trenton Williams
Defendant:
Seamster, Ball, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zell v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Rebecca D Zell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
