Cases 21 - 30 of 155
United States of America v. 8.76 Acres, more or less situated in Silver Bow County, State of Montana et al
as 2:2022cv00011
Defendant:
Opportunity Bank of America, New Direction Trust Company, 8.76 Acres, more or less situated in Silver Bow County, State of Montana and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1471 Federal Aviation Act
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 2.68 Acres of Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 2.68 Acres of Land, More or Less, in DeSoto County, Mississippi, Cedarwood Farms, L.L.C., First Horizon Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant:
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. 2.092 Acres of Land in Putnam County, Florida et al
as 3:2021cv00277
Defendant:
2.092 Acres of Land in Putnam County, Florida, Timothy A. Lambert, Unknown Owners and others
Plaintiff:
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. 0.427 Acres of Land in Putnam County, Florida et al
as 3:2021cv00250
Defendant:
Rosa Lee Smoke, Willie Scott, 0.427 Acres of Land in Putnam County, Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.072 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00372
Defendant:
Idolinda Flores Gutierrez, San Juana Alicia Flores, Arnoldo Javier Flores and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2.333 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00268
Defendant:
Marissa Iris G. Lee, Ameida Salinas, Starr County Tax Assessor-Collector, 2.333 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.652 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00269
Defendant:
Marissa Iris G. Lee, Ameida Salinas, Starr County Tax Assessor-Collector, The Unknown Heirs of Felipe Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
