Cases 1 - 10 of 33
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 189.9 rods in Twsp. 149, et al
as 24-1693
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant:
189.9 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: W1/2SE1/4 Section 14: NW1/4NE1/4 McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 227.8 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: N1/2SW1/4, W1/2SE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 242.0 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 2: SW1/4SE1/4 Section 11: NE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across and others
Anson et al v. City of Deltona
as 6:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Damian Anson, Debra Bennett, John Bennett and others
Defendant:
City of Deltona, Florida and City of Deltona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Torts to Land
United States of America et al v. 0.005 Acre of Land, More or Less, & Cemetery, Bural & Access Rights with Respect to Six Tracks of Land et al
as 3:2021cv00249
Defendant:
Lena Ruth Redd Davis, Unknown Heirs of Martha Polite, Jaqueline D. Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant:
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Delores Ann Springer, John Charles Tiger, Nancie Lou Longacres Warrior and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Coachella Valley Association of Governments v. 52.462 Acres of Land et al
as 5:2019cv02419
Defendant:
Elias Diaz, RUTH ELAINE PATENCIO, DESERT COVE GOLF RESORT, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
Claimant:
Palm Springs Motors Inc
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 0946
United States of America v. 6.10 Acres of Land, more or less et al
as 7:2019cv00409
Defendant:
CAROLINA OLVERA DURAN, Paula S Botello, Maria Angelita Castillo Cordova and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-066.000-ROW-T et al
as 5:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-066.000-ROW-T, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Connie Lou Augustine, Audry L. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 189.9 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: W1/2SE1/4 Section 14: NW1/4NE1/4 McKenzie County, North Dakota et al
as 1:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant:
189.9 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: W1/2SE1/4 Section 14: NW1/4NE1/4 McKenzie County, North Dakota, 227.8 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: N1/2SW1/4, W1/2SE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, 242.0 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 2: SW1/4SE1/4 Section 11: NE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.61 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.82 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-20.04 et al
as 3:2018cv01996
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.61 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.82 ACRES IN ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1001-18-20.04, LEONARD GOINS, SHARON GOINS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
