Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. 2.032 acres of land, more or less, permanent easement (pipeline right-of-way) et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC
Defendant: 2.032 acres of land, more or less, permanent easement (pipeline right-of-way), 4.695 acres of land, more or less, temporary work space, in JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS, Tract No. TX-JEFF-FG-002, Robert c Hicks, Vivian Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 1.65 Acres of Land, more or less, in Desoto County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff: United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: An Easement and Right-Of-Way over 1.65 Acres of Land, more or less, in Desoto County, Mississippi, J & M Holdings, LLC, Bancorpsouth Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Bartter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00239
Defendant: Bartter, Dominion Resources, Inc., NiSource Corporate Services Company and others
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. Ward Transformer Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00304
Defendant: The State of North Carolina, The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Ward Transformer Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.79 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 1.32 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON, COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. J5-21-00007 et al
as 5:2019cv01131
Defendant: A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.79 ACRES + AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 1.32 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON, COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. J5-21-7, TOWNSHIP OF MOORE, AND ALL UNKNOWN OWNERS and others
Plaintiff: PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.63 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H4-8-5 et al
as 5:2019cv01133
Defendant: CONSTANCE C. JOHNSON, A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.63 ACRES + IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. H4-8-5 and ALL UNKNOWN OWNERS
Plaintiff: PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.33 ACRES+TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.08 ACRES+ IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHHAMPTION COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA,TAX PARCEL NO.H4-8-7-38 et al
as 5:2019cv01134
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA INC., MOORE TOWNSHIP and others
Plaintiff: PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 2.69 Acres, more or less, in Nelson County, VA, ID No. 20-5-14 (formerly 20-5-15) composed of 41.02 acres, more or less et al
as 3:2019cv00005
Plaintiff: Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: Carol M. Moore, 2.69 Acres, more or less, in Nelson County, VA, ID No. (formerly composed of 41.02 acres, more or less and William S. Moore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Moore v. City of Laurel Tax and Inspection Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00191
Plaintiff: Gary Moore
Defendant: City of Laurel Tax and Inspection Department and SKL Investment Inc. Edgewood LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. Turman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01502
Defendant: Connie Sout, Jacob D. Cronin, The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?