Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cox v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 6:2022cv01919
Plaintiff:
M Stephen Cox and Stephen M Cox
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Cox v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2019cv03021
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Cox
Defendant:
BNSF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox v. Ann Arbor Railroad, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cox
Defendant:
Ann Arbor Railroad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Rene Alvarez, et al v. USA
as 16-16479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENE ALVAREZ, SIMONE ALVAREZ, ANTHONY ANGLADA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alvarez et al v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rene Alvarez , Simone Alvarez , Anthony Anglada and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cox v. Metro-North RR Co et al
as 3:2008cv00734
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cox and Gregory Cox
Defendant:
Metro-North RR Co, Metro-North RR Co, Curcio Carting Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jarmuth v. Cox
as 07-2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD E. JARMUTH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN COX and KEVIN COX PROFESSIONAL GROUP, now known as Kevin Cox, M.D.
Cox v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv00893
Plaintiff:
Jason Cox
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jarmuth v. Cox et al
as 1:2007cv00033
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Jarmuth
Defendant:
Kevin Cox, Kevin Cox, Kevin Cox Professional Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Cox v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2007cv00033
Plaintiff:
James Cox, James Cox and James Cox
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
