Cases 121 - 130 of 573
NOWELL et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00943
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, GEORGE SOLOMON, ANGELA SINTEF and others
Plaintiff:
DYREL NOWELL, GEORGE MOORE and CLINTON SKINNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DARDEN v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00947
Defendant:
ROBERT LEON, ANGELA SINTEF, KAREN STEINOUR and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01879
Plaintiff:
Sean Jordan
Defendant:
Nordo, Inc. and Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc. d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01879
Plaintiff:
Sean Jordan
Defendant:
Nordo, Inc. and Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc. d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Ollie's Bargain Outlet, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00115
Plaintiff:
Sharon Jordan
Defendant:
Ollie's Bargain Outlet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walden-Doppke v. Jordan's Furniture, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00360
Defendant:
Jordan's Furniture, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Helen Walden-Doppke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blaisdell v. Saginaw et al
as 1:2020cv12074
Defendant:
Kathryn Jeffers-Mercer, Nathaniel Voelker, Robert Ruth and others
Plaintiff:
Mia Blaisdell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Dorrestijn et al
as 2:2020cv01501
Defendant:
Heather Dorrestijn and Robert Dorrestijn
Plaintiff:
Martha Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUSHIE, et al. v. BLACK AND GERNGROSS, P.C., et al.
as 2:2020cv02773
Plaintiff:
MEGAN M. YOUNG and Alfred Jordan Rushie
Defendant:
JENNA ELISE RUSHIE, BLACK AND GERNGROSS, P.C., Elizabeth Santry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPERBER et al v. JORDAN et al
as 2:2020cv06257
Defendant:
JOHN E JORDAN, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, M. RANFT and others
Plaintiff:
PETER SPERBER and BARBARA SPERBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
