Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Hotchkiss et al v. CVS Pharmacy Inc
as 1:2018cv00090
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy Inc
Plaintiff:
Allison Hotchkiss
Involuntary_plaintiff:
Jack Schroeder and Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schroeder v. Schape Fitness, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02943
Plaintiff:
Tracy Schroeder
Defendant:
Schape Fitness, Inc. and Balanced Body, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schroeder v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 8:2017cv01667
Plaintiff:
Marnie Schroeder
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHROEDER v. INFUSION BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC.
as 1:2015cv01494
Defendant:
INFUSION BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC.
Plaintiff:
DEANNA SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Essex Energy LLC v. Willis et al
as 3:2015cv00307
Plaintiff:
Essex Energy LLC
Defendant:
Fishman Haygood LLP, David-Logan Schroeder and Sterling Scott Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Sagez et al v. Popular Securities, Inc.
as 5:2014cv01065
Plaintiff:
Douglas G. Finstrom, Christian Fisher, Great Oaks Farms, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Popular Securities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Schroeder v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Elizabeth Schroeder
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schroeder v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv19467
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Elizabeth Schroeder
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schroeder v. United States Postal Service et al
as 7:2014cv00441
Plaintiff:
Barbara E. Schroeder
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Zabielski-Schroeder et al v. Menard Inc
as 2:2013cv00451
Plaintiff:
Tina Zabielski-Schroeder and Ray Schroeder
Defendant:
Menard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
