Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McGinley v. United States Air Force et al
as 3:2024cv03097
Plaintiff:
Beau L. McGinley
Defendant:
United States Air Force, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael R. Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Pellet v. Pence and MacMillan LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Benoit Jean Francois Xavier Pellet
Defendant:
Pence and MacMillan LLC and Devon P O'Connell Esq
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
White v. Yother et al
as 4:2021cv00045
Plaintiff:
Roman Teague White
Defendant:
Mark Yother and Landon Pence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Yother et al
as 1:2021cv00252
Plaintiff:
Roman Teague White
Defendant:
Mark Yother and Landon Pence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vaughn v. Gates et al
as 4:2021cv00503
Plaintiff:
William Vaughn and Mosias
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Michael R. Pence, Melinda Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATEL v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00758
Defendant:
PIKUL PATEL, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holger et al v. Burgess et al
as 3:2018cv00277
Defendant:
State of Alaska Inc., Shawn Rice, Families Matter LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger and Michael Anthony Ogle
Lindsay et al v. Trump et al
as 2:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Lindsay, Esq., J.A.G., Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Mike Pence, James Norman Mattis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pence v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01594
Plaintiff:
Geni D. Pence
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pence v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv25233
Plaintiff:
Geni D. Pence
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
