Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00629
Plaintiff: Carefirst of Maryland, Inc., Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc., Carefirst Bluechoice, Inc. and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Biotech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Remicade Antitrust Litigation
as 23-1798
Appellee: In re: REMICADE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, LOCAL 295 IBT EMPLOYER GROUP WELFARE FUND and WELFARE FUND OF PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 200
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSE GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee: JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN BIOTECH INC
NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04326
Defendant: JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff: NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN, LOCAL 295 IBT EMPLOYER GROUP WELFARE FUND and THE WELFARE FUND OF PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 200
Petitioner: THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
In Re: REMICADE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Interested Party: THE KROGER CO and WALGREEN CO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2015md02626
Defendant: ABB/Con-cise Optical Group, LLC, ABB Optical Group, 1-800-Contacts.Com and others
Plaintiff: Jennifer Cristiano, Heather Butcher, Christian Miller and others
Interested Party: Jeffrey Stetler, Benjamin W. Hewitt, Monika Pasek and others
In Re: In Re: Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litigation and Evan A. Strassberg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Gilead Holdings, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00880
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Gilead Sciences, LLC, Janssen R&D Ireland and others
Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and Kinney Drugs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Rhodes et al v. Rhodes Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45076
Defendant: Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Beverly Sackler, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Silvers, Lea Anne Spradlen and Roger Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00737
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Johnson & Johnson Inc., Gilead Sciences, LLC and others
Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv20170
Defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, GILEAD SCIENCES, LLC, GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. and others
Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Antitrust Litigation
Rhodes et al v. Rhodes Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00885
Defendant: Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., Beverly Sackler, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Silvers, Lea Anne Spradlen and Roger Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?