Cases 11 - 20 of 240
Ash v. City of Portland
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Ash
Defendant:
City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davenell Ash v. Duluth Police Dept., et al
as 24-1459
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Duluth Police Department and Minnesota State Patrol
Ash, Davenell v. Superior Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Superior Police Dept., Judge Kelly Thimm, Prosecutor Chad Lalor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steckler v. Town of Waterford et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Angelo C. Steckler
Defendant:
Town of Waterford, Town of Waterford Police Department, Town of Waterford Police Officer Ryan Ashe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bureau v. Merrimack Police Department et al
as 1:2023fp00492
Plaintiff:
Steven Bureau
Defendant:
Merrimack Police Department, Haley Ash, Justin Agraz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ash v. Russell
as 1:2023cv02873
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Ash
Defendant:
Judge George L. Russell, III and George L. Russell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Julian Ash v. OPM
as 23-1992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIAN R. ASH
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Sternberg v. Warneck et al
as 2:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Michael C Sternberg
Defendant:
Shelley Warneck, Jeff Rosen, Steve Wolfson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. Law Enforcement Agencies et al
as 0:2023cv02860
Plaintiff:
Davenell L Ash
Defendant:
Law Enforcement Agencies and Duluth, MN Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Anchorage School District et al
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Nial Sherwood Williams
Defendant:
Anchorage School District, Alaska Department of Corrections, Stephen C. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
