Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Prew v. Gleason
as 4:2022cv10898
Plaintiff:
Ashley Prew
Defendant:
John Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holger v. Romain et al
as 2:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger
Defendant:
Sonia R. Romain, Susanne Daley, Sharon L. Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jane Doe v. City of Concord, et al
as 22-15384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CONCORD, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, GUY SWANGER and others
Mays et al v. The Cabell County Board of Education et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Herman Mays, Jr., C. M., Elizabeth Mays and others
Defendant:
The Cabell County Board of Education, Ryan Saxe and Daniel Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holger et al v. Gleason et al
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger and The Alaska Native Children & Families
Defendant:
Sharon L. Gleason, Jonas M. Walker, Bryan Schroder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Darko v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv06467
Plaintiff:
Ernest K Darko
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Anfernee Ixcot, Jose Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blunt #252203 v. Gleason
as 1:2021cv00924
Plaintiff:
James A. Blunt #252203
Defendant:
Michael Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv40062
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Rochester v. Town of Milo et al
as 6:2020cv07006
Defendant:
Jared Webster, P. Earle Gleason, Town of Milo and others
Plaintiff:
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Rochester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cheever et al v. Zmuda et al
as 2:2020cv02555
Plaintiff:
Sidney Gleason and Scott Cheever
Defendant:
Jeffrey Zmuda, Sam Cline and Shannon Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
