Cases 31 - 40 of 108
WILLIAMS v. DWD-UI CONTACT CENTER IU TEAM et al
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
QURTIS MANDALE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DWD-UI CONTACT CENTER IU TEAM, DWD, VALDIVIA DEMERITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Gryder v. Freddie Mac et al
as 1:2021cv01380
Plaintiff:
Ken Gryder
Defendant:
Freddie Mac, Freddie Mac Board of Directors, Greg Watchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington Jr. v. Suffolk County Sheriff et al
as 2:2021cv05765
Plaintiff:
George Washington Jr.
Defendant:
Suffolk County Sheriff, India Embassy in USA, NYS Court System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. EEOC, et al
as 2:2021cv00222
Defendant:
United States of America and EEOC
Plaintiff:
Mikeyla K. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Quesada v. Martinez et al
as 3:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Robert Erbe, J.D. Whitaker, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and others
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Quesada
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Grant v. Hyundai Mobis of West Point, GA et al
as 1:2020cv04980
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Buck Hamilton & Associates, EEOC of Atlanta, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Caroline Danette Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. EEOC of Atlanta, GA et al
as 1:2020cv04440
Defendant:
Ivan Garcia, Darrell Graham, EEOC of Atlanta, GA and others
Plaintiff:
Caroline Danette Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01664
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Vincent v. EEOC
as 5:2020cv00183
Plaintiff:
Arthur Vincent
Defendant:
EEOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCALL v. KANE et al
as 2:2020cv00287
Defendant:
JUANITA BARBER, MARLEA J. APPLEGATE, DEBORAH KANE and others
Plaintiff:
DAIJON MCCALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
