Cases 31 - 40 of 208
DB Enterprises Developers-Builders, Inc. v. BOROUGH OF NORWOOD
as 2:2021cv02242
Plaintiff:
DB Enterprises Developers-Builders, Inc.
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NORWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02239
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BETANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Deluca et al
as 1:2021cv01010
Defendant:
David Norwood and Dr. Joseph Deluca
Plaintiff:
Wremburen Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Shippers Warehouse of Illinois, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00917
Plaintiff:
Ashley Norwood
Defendant:
Shippers Warehouse of Illinois, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starks v. Fulbright et al
as 3:2020cv03543
Defendant:
Mike Dowd, Gene Knize, James E Lagomarsino and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Norwood Starks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanGelder v. Helget et al
as 0:2020cv02327
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Simon Trautmann and Kate Graham
Defendant:
City of Norwood Young America, Steven Helget and Norwood Young America
Plaintiff:
Mark VanGelder
Consolidated Defendant:
Justin Templin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04334
Defendant:
AT&T INC. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BETANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tucker v. Ables et al
as 3:2020cv00359
Defendant:
Merit Health Central, Deborah Ables, Terry Brantley and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Maroney v. Village of Norwood et al
as 8:2019cv01404
Defendant:
Norwood Village Police Department, Village of Norwood and Seth Donalis
Plaintiff:
Kasey Maroney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lyles v. Tillery, et al
as 5:2019cv00459
Plaintiff:
Hildred Manuel Lyles, Jr.
Defendant:
Erik Hooks, Danny Safrit, Katy Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
