Cases 41 - 50 of 56
William Fennimore v. Lower Twp, et al
as 11-2522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM FENNIMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWER TWP, DOUGLAS WHITTEN, MICHAEL IAMES and others
Whitten v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2011cv01251
Plaintiff:
Donovan Whitten
Defendant:
County of Alameda, J. Malizia, S. Tyrrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2011cv01251
Plaintiff:
Donovan Whitten
Defendant:
County of Alameda , J. Malizia , S. Tyrrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2011cv10158
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , Maureen Whitten and Gregory Tourville
Plaintiff:
Arturo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vineyard v. Soto et al
as 3:2010cv01481
Defendant:
Officer David Baker, Andrew Farris, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Lee Vineyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. UNH, et al
as 10-2316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, BRUCE L. MALLORY and ROBERT C. WHITTEN
Augustine Fallay v. CCSF, et al
as 10-16437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUGUSTINE FALLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION, DAVID CARR and others
Jimenez v. Newell, et al
as 2:2009cv00998
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Julie P Newell, Christopher T Whitten, Andrew Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FENNIMORE v. LOWER TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2009cv02090
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FENNIMORE
Defendant:
LOWER TOWNSHIP, DOUGLAS WHITTEN, MICHAEL IAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. University of New Hampshire et al
as 1:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
John Collins
Defendant:
University of New Hampshire, Bruce L. Mallory and Robert C. Whitten
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
