Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dougal v. Lewicki et al
as 1:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Robert Dougal
Defendant:
Eric Lewicki, Christopher Martin, Nick Dziamba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. McDonnell
as 3:2023cv04276
Plaintiff:
Mario Torres
Defendant:
Public Defender Ellen McDonnell, Robin Lipetzky, Elizabeth Harrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Mark Shotwell v. Delaware Department of Safety and Homeland Securit, et al
as 23-2018
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARK J. SHOTWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY, DSHS, ROBERT COUPE, DSHS Cabinet Secretary, LEWIS D. SCHILIRO, Former DSHS Cabinet Secretary and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW GATTI, DSP Detective and CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, DSP Sergeant
Spivey v. Martin et al
as 2:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Spivey
Defendant:
Christopher Martin, Joe Cuellar, Leonel Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. Martin
as 22-10011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mucio Ramirez
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Martin
Ramirez v. Martin
as 3:2020cv01927
Defendant:
Christopher Martin
Plaintiff:
Mucio Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Becton et al
as 3:2019cv06865
Defendant:
Christopher Martin, Contra Costa County, Office of the Public Defenders and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shotwell v. Sapp et al
as 1:2018cv00984
Defendant:
Captain Jason Sapp, Detective Gatti, Captain Pete Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Shotwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Murphy
as 4:2017cv00854
Plaintiff:
Christopher Martin
Defendant:
Dennis Jason Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Clatterbuck v. City of Charlottesville
as 15-1299
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALBERT CLATTERBUCK and CHRISTOPHER MARTIN
Plaintiff:
EARL MCCRAW, JOHN JORDAN and MICHAEL SLOAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
