Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Allen-Smith v. US Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen-Smith
Defendant:
US Marshall and FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv21368
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Finney v. Akron City School District Board of Education et al.
as 5:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
Vyrone A. Finney
Defendant:
Akron City School District Board of Education, Bruce D. Alexander, N. J. Akbar and others
Interested Party:
Dave Yost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE KEVIN MCNULTY, JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry et al v. Davis et al
as 3:2016cv11101
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Perry and Joshua Allen Perry
Defendant:
K. A. Davis and Steve Deweese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruse et al v. Regina Caeli, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10304
Plaintiff:
John G. Kruse and Marie Kruse
Defendant:
Regina Caeli, Inc. , Rich Beckman , Peter Idler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castaneda v. City of Moline, Illinois et al
as 4:2013cv04040
Plaintiff:
Eustaquio Castaneda
Defendant:
City of Moline, Illinois , County of Rock Island , city of east moline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stewart et al v. Patrick et al
as 1:2011cv01108
Plaintiff:
Amy L. Stewart and Joshua Allen Lanier
Defendant:
Michael Patrick and City of Samson, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber et al v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2011cv03249
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber and Joshua Allen Barber
Defendant:
Alabama, State of , Jefferson County , Alfred Bahakel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
