Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Alabama Coalition for Immigrant Justice et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2024cv01254
Defendant:
Sheila Cox Barbuck, Barry Stephenson, Steve Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Carmel Michelle Coe, Roald Hazelhoff, Alabama Coalition for Immigrant Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lawson, Gabe Hart, Victor Ashe and others
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins, Steven R. Finney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Steve Marshall, William R Adair, T Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk, MARY H. MELFI, in her capacity as Hunterdon County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Appellant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEMOCRATIC ORGANIZATION, LAURA ALI, NEW JERSEY REPUBLICAN CHAIRS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
FULOP FOR GOVERNOR, ELECTION LAW CLINIC AT HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY and others
League of Women Voters of New Hampshire et al v. Kramer et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
League of Women Voters of New Hampshire, League of Women Voters of the United States, Nancy Marashio and others
Defendant:
Steve Kramer, Lingo Telecom, LLC and Life Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Republican National Committee et al v. Benson et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Republican National Committee, Jordan Jorritsma and Emerson Silvernail
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson and Jonathan Brater
Intervenor:
Detroit Disability Power, Michigan Alliance for Retired Americans and League of Women Voters of Michigan
Petitioner:
Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KIM et al v. HANLON et al
as 3:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE GIORDANO HANLON, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO and others
Intervenor:
LAURA ALI, JOSE ARANGO, New Jersey Republican Chairs Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY, Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund and others
Interested Party:
DALE CROSS, JEFF PARROTT and TAHESHA WAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Republican National Committee et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Republican National Committee, Mississippi Republican Party, James Perry and others
Defendant:
Justin Wetzel, Toni Jo Diaz, Becky Payne and others
Intervenor:
Vet Voice Foundation and Mississippi Alliance for Retired Americans
Petitioner:
Disability Rights Mississippi, League of Women Voters of Mississippi and Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Paxton
as 23-50885
Plaintiff / Appellee:
La Union del Pueblo Entero, Friendship-West Baptist Church, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas, Jane Nelson, in her official capacity as Texas Secretary of State, State of Texas and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Republican National Committee
Ashe et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2023cv01256
Plaintiff:
Victor Ashe, Phil Lawson and League of Women Voters of Tennessee
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins and Jonathan Skrmetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
