Cases 11 - 20 of 473
Hayes v. Patrick
as 3:2023cv01546
Petitioner:
Kurnicus Hayes
Respondent:
Arnold Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Norwood
as 23-6089
Petitioner / Appellant:
WENDELL MONTRELL HAYES
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSEPH NORWOOD
Hall v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02125
Petitioner:
Nigel Hall
Respondent:
State of North Carolina, Major Ward and Dexter Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hayes v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2023cv02475
Petitioner:
Henry Lee Hayes
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Defendant:
Director York County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00752
Petitioner:
Rosablanca Monique Hayes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
Gordon E Hayes
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hayes v. Gitter
as 2:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Daveon Kyree Hayes
Respondent:
William Gitter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Cain
as 3:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Harold Ray Hayes, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections and Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Hemingway
as 4:2023cv10312
Petitioner:
James G. Hayes
Respondent:
United States of America and Jonathan Hemingway
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
Hayes v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Steve Hayes, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
