Cases 11 - 20 of 3,890
Horton v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01231
Respondent:
Jeffrey Nines, State of Maryland and Ricky Horton
Petitioner:
Troydrick Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Henley et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Rodriguez
Respondent:
John Henley and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yexley v. Reyes et al
as 1:2024cv01010
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wade Yexley
Respondent:
Alejandro Reyes and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chronister v. Wallace
as 1:2024cv01946
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Chronister
Respondent:
Terri Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Eastman v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01107
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Todd Eastman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERSHBERGER v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
ENOS HERSHBERGER
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF JEFFREY BURKETT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERSHBERGER v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00520
Petitioner:
ENOS HERSHBERGER
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF JEFFREY BURKETT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gould v. State of Conn et al
as 3:2024cv00674
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Gould
Respondent:
State of Conn and GA-15
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv01460
Petitioner:
Barry Brooks and Adom Brooks
Respondent:
Sheriff Frank Reynolds, Shannon Wallace and Jeffrey S. Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
