General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 207
Kevin Malone v. State of Nebraska, et al
as 22-2561
Petitioner / Appellant: Kevin W. Malone
Respondent / Appellee: State of Nebraska and Scott R. Frakes, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Malone v. USA
as 22-10687
Petitioner / Appellant: Donald Lloyd Malone
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Michael Malone v. Tim Shoop
as 22-3418
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL ANTONIO MALONE
Defendant / Appellee: TIM SHOOP, Warden
Malone v. Pliler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01692
Petitioner: Mr. Donald L. Malone
Respondent: Mr. William S. Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Malone v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2022cv00044
Petitioner: Orlando Malone
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RIGGS et al v. DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
as 3:2022cv00019
Defendant: DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.
Petitioner: AARON L. RIGGS, JONATHAN M. CARROLL, JASON L. CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. United States of America
as 5:2022hc02022
Petitioner: Jimmy D. Malone
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David E. Malone v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00171
Petitioner: David E. Malone
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MALONE v. VANIHEL
as 2:2022cv00013
Petitioner: CHAD MALONE
Respondent: FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acoff v. Mickey et al
as 2:2021cv01145
Petitioner: Mario Dewayne Acoff
Respondent: Mickey, Fox, Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?