Cases 11 - 20 of 35
McDonald v. Easter
as 3:2020cv01737
Respondent:
Easter
Petitioner:
Megan McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kemberling v. Capozza
as 3:2020cv01760
Petitioner:
Anthony Lee Kemberling
Respondent:
Mark Capozza, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ADA Megan Elizabeth Ryland-Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BULLITT v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2020cv00136
Petitioner:
JAMES BULLITT
Respondent:
TIM PHEGLEY and MEGAN LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kyte v. State of Ohio
as 1:2019cv00809
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Petitioner:
Megan Kyte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Rood v. Megan's Law Website
as 2:2019cv01290
Respondent:
Megan's Law Website
Petitioner:
Colton Rood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scandle v. Ransom et al
as 1:2019cv00996
Petitioner:
Roland D. Scandle, Jr.
Respondent:
Superintendent Kevin Ransom and PA Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
ADA Megan Elizabeth Ryland-Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kyte v. Persson
as 3:2018cv00649
Petitioner:
Megan Elizabeth Kyte
Respondent:
Rob Persson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hidalgo v. Baca et al
as 3:2018cv00153
Respondent:
Isidro Baca, Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State of
Unknown:
Adam P. Laxalt, Megan Hoffman, Rene Valladares and others
Petitioner:
Luis A Hidalgo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foncette v. Muse et al
as 2:2018cv00691
Petitioner:
Kenrick Foncette
Respondent:
Megan Muse and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. State of New York Board of Parole et al
as 9:2018cv00220
Respondent:
Michael Mchale, State of New York Board of Parole and Megan Hickey
Petitioner:
Kenneth L. Washington and Kenneth Lamar Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
