Cases 11 - 20 of 135
Batty, Jr. v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Petitioner:
Warner Ervin Batty, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon, Dr. Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02459
Petitioner:
Gary Wayne Warner
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
WARNER v. MCNAIRY COUNTY COURT et al
as 1:2022cv01755
Petitioner:
ROMAN E. WARNER
Respondent:
MCNAIRY COUNTY COURT, STATE OF TENNESSEE and REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Pasco County Jail et al (Pasco County)
as 8:2022cv01964
Petitioner:
Theodore Warner
Respondent:
Pasco County Jail, Chris Nocco and Wellpath Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Henderson
as 3:2022cv01345
Petitioner:
Jason D. Warner
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Warner
as 3:2022cv05486
Petitioner:
John Michael Brooks
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Rivers
as 22-10646
Petitioner / Appellant:
Adelbert H. Warner, II
Respondent / Appellee:
C. Rivers, Warden, FCI Seagoville
Warner v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022hc02100
Petitioner:
Luke Joseph Warner
Respondent:
Warden Ramos, FMC Devens, FBOP-DSCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Warner v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00200
Petitioner:
Gary Wayne Warner
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. St. Andre
as 3:2022cv02916
Petitioner:
Ryan Scott Warner
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
