Cases 201 - 210 of 417,984
Bennings et al v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00877
Petitioner:
Antonio Bennings and Addison Bennings
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ussery v. State of GA et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Roger Ussery
Respondent:
State of GA, Georgia State Prison and R. U. Jackson
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conner v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Albertus Conner, Jr
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maldonado v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Frankie Maldonado
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Wolcott
as 9:2024cv00661
Petitioner:
Vandon Jones
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06305
Petitioner:
Jose L. Torres
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALEXANDER v. SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
KAREEM-LATEEF ALEXANDER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BROTHERS and PA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dhimo v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv03039
Petitioner:
Alqi Dhimo
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 9:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Hicks
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner:
Waytayha Scott
Respondent:
Tikki M. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
