General Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Smith v. Quintana
as 5:2016cv00011
Petitioner: Cedric James Smith
Respondent: Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Estus Smith v. Brian Ladner, Warden
as 16-60028
Petitioner - Appellant: ESTUS JAMES SMITH, also known as James Estus Smith
Respondent - Appellee: BRIAN LADNER, Warden, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Smith v. Stephens
as 1:2015cv00836
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Albert James Smith
Respondent: Williams Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Dismas Charities et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv10749
Petitioner: James Smith
Respondent: Dismas Charities and U. S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Bryson
as 1:2015cv02162
Petitioner: Lester James Smith, Jr.
Respondent: Homer Bryson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00146
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Everett James Smith
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Dir TDCJ
as 5:2015cv00031
Petitioner: Everett James Smith
Respondent: Dir TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Taylor v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 15-1457
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT X. TAYLOR, also known as James Smith
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Smith v. Turner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00012
Plaintiff: Estus James Smith
Defendant: Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Cain et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00361
Respondent: N. Burl Cain and Buddy Caldwell
Petitioner: Anthony James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?